ENS Funding Rate History — Settled Payments by Exchange
Ethereum Name Service
| Exchange | Settlements | Total Paid | Average APR | Largest | Smallest | Last Settled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 720 | +0.9924% | +12.08% | +0.0108% | +0.0013% | 2026-09-23 18:00 UTC | |
| 90 | +0.8868% | +10.80% | +0.0100% | +0.0007% | 2026-09-23 16:00 UTC | |
| 90 | +0.8491% | +10.34% | +0.0220% | -0.0134% | 2026-09-23 16:00 UTC | |
| 90 | +0.8341% | +10.16% | +0.0100% | -0.0130% | 2026-09-23 16:00 UTC | |
| 90 | +0.8019% | +9.76% | +0.0100% | -0.0148% | 2026-09-23 16:00 UTC | |
| 90 | +0.7617% | +9.27% | +0.0100% | -0.0117% | 2026-09-23 16:00 UTC | |
| 90 | +0.7469% | +9.09% | +0.0100% | -0.0163% | 2026-09-23 16:00 UTC | |
| 90 | +0.7448% | +9.07% | +0.0100% | -0.0163% | 2026-09-23 16:00 UTC | |
| 90 | +0.7427% | +9.04% | +0.0100% | -0.0163% | 2026-09-23 16:00 UTC | |
| 720 | +0.7367% | +8.97% | +0.0013% | -0.0030% | 2026-09-23 18:00 UTC | |
| 90 | +0.7309% | +8.90% | +0.0110% | -0.0163% | 2026-09-23 16:00 UTC | |
| 456 | +0.7202% | +1.73% | +0.0100% | -0.0080% | 2026-09-23 16:00 UTC | |
| 90 | +0.7073% | +8.61% | +0.0100% | -0.0278% | 2026-09-23 16:00 UTC | |
| 90 | +0.6947% | +8.46% | +0.0100% | -0.0163% | 2026-09-23 16:00 UTC | |
| 90 | +0.6895% | +8.40% | +0.0160% | -0.0100% | 2026-09-23 16:00 UTC | |
| 90 | +0.6842% | +8.33% | +0.0100% | -0.0230% | 2026-09-23 16:00 UTC | |
| 90 | +0.6260% | +7.62% | +0.0100% | -0.0277% | 2026-09-23 16:00 UTC | |
| 720 | +0.3588% | +4.37% | +0.0013% | -0.0109% | 2026-09-23 18:00 UTC |
What the ENS funding rate means
What ENS (Ethereum Name Service) actually paid over the last 30 days: 3,876 settlements across 18 venues, broken down venue by venue. These are settled payments — the amount an exchange actually charged or credited each funding interval — not the rate currently quoted for the next payment. Hyperliquid paid the most over the window at +0.9924% of position size.
A funding rate quoted right now is a forecast of the next payment; what a position actually earned is the sum of payments that already settled. Two venues can quote a similar rate and still pay very differently over a month, because they settle on different schedules and compute the rate from their own order book rather than a shared index. The rate was positive in 92% of the 3,876 settlements recorded here, meaning longs paid shorts that often.
Over the window, settled totals ranged from +0.9924% on Hyperliquid to +0.3588% on ApeX — the gap between them is what a delta-neutral position collecting on both legs would have captured before fees and slippage. Verify the live version of this spread on the ORBIT funding screener before sizing a trade: settled history shows what already happened, not what will happen next.
Frequently asked questions
- Is the ENS funding rate a live quote or an actual payment?
- A funding rate quoted right now is a forecast of the next payment; what a position actually earned is the sum of payments that already settled. Two venues can quote a similar rate and still pay very differently over a month, because they settle on different schedules and compute the rate from their own order book rather than a shared index. The rate was positive in 92% of the 3,876 settlements recorded here.
- Which exchange has paid the most settled ENS funding recently?
- Hyperliquid paid the most over the last 30 days at +0.9924% of position size across 720 settlements, an average annualized rate of +12.08%. This is a sum of actual payments, not a forecast.
- How often is ENS funding actually paid?
- Over the last 30 days, ORBIT recorded 3,876 funding settlements for ENS across 18 venues. Settlement schedules differ by venue — some pay hourly, others every 4 or 8 hours — so the number of payments per venue in the table above is not the same for all of them.