ORBIT vs perpdexlist: Funding Screener Comparison
Both ORBIT and perpdexlist help with perpetual funding. The difference that matters for a funding-arbitrage trader is not which instantaneous APR is quoted, but how much a setup actually paid and what is left after entry and exit costs. The table covers funding features only.
Checked: 2026-10-27
| Feature | ORBIT | perpdexlist |
|---|---|---|
| Funding actually paid (settlement history) | Yes 7d/30d/90d paid averages | Yes paid 24h/7d/30d per market |
| Instantaneous funding APR | Yes | Yes |
| Entry cost from the live order book | Yes | Yes $10k/$100k/$1M page, also a column in asset tables |
| Capacity: how much money a setup absorbs | Yes | Not verified |
| Setup stability (does the spread hold) | Yes on exchange-pair pages | Not verified |
| Pair backtest with costs | Yes | Not verified |
| Venues covered | Yes 55 | Yes 47 |
Where perpdexlist is strong
A perp data reference with about 9,000 indexed pages in English, Chinese, Japanese and Korean, readable by AI agents (Markdown, llms.txt).
Frequently asked questions
- Does perpdexlist show funding that was actually paid?
- Yes — as of our 2026-10-27 check, perpdexlist has funding actually paid (settlement history).
- How is ORBIT different from perpdexlist for funding arbitrage?
- ORBIT ranks setups by what they actually paid and what is left after order-book entry and exit costs, not by the instantaneous APR, and shows how much money a setup can absorb.
- When was this comparison checked?
- 2026-10-27, from perpdexlist's public pages. Features we could not find are marked "not verified", not "no".