ORBIT vs loris.tools: Funding Screener Comparison
Both ORBIT and loris.tools help with perpetual funding. The difference that matters for a funding-arbitrage trader is not which instantaneous APR is quoted, but how much a setup actually paid and what is left after entry and exit costs. The table covers funding features only.
Checked: 2026-10-27
| Feature | ORBIT | loris.tools |
|---|---|---|
| Funding actually paid (settlement history) | Yes 7d/30d/90d paid averages | Yes settlement funding in the paid API (from $79/mo) |
| Instantaneous funding APR | Yes | Yes |
| Entry cost from the live order book | Yes | Not verified |
| Capacity: how much money a setup absorbs | Yes | Not verified |
| Setup stability (does the spread hold) | Yes on exchange-pair pages | Not verified |
| Pair backtest with costs | Yes | Yes execution cost typed in by hand |
| Venues covered | Yes 55 | Yes 43–44 |
Where loris.tools is strong
A trading terminal with widgets: options, liquidations, order-book depth, HIP-3/HIP-4 pages, pair execution and a paid data API ($79/$199/$499 a month).
Frequently asked questions
- Does loris.tools show funding that was actually paid?
- Yes — as of our 2026-10-27 check, loris.tools has funding actually paid (settlement history).
- How is ORBIT different from loris.tools for funding arbitrage?
- ORBIT ranks setups by what they actually paid and what is left after order-book entry and exit costs, not by the instantaneous APR, and shows how much money a setup can absorb.
- When was this comparison checked?
- 2026-10-27, from loris.tools's public pages. Features we could not find are marked "not verified", not "no".