ORBIT vs CoinGlass: Funding Screener Comparison
Both ORBIT and CoinGlass help with perpetual funding. The difference that matters for a funding-arbitrage trader is not which instantaneous APR is quoted, but how much a setup actually paid and what is left after entry and exit costs. The table covers funding features only.
Checked: 2026-09-27
| Feature | ORBIT | CoinGlass |
|---|---|---|
| Funding actually paid (settlement history) | Yes 7d/30d/90d paid averages | Not verified |
| Instantaneous funding APR | Yes | Yes funding rate tables and an arbitrage page |
| Entry cost from the live order book | Yes | Not verified |
| Capacity: how much money a setup absorbs | Yes | Not verified |
| Setup stability (does the spread hold) | Yes on exchange-pair pages | Not verified |
| Pair backtest with costs | Yes | Not verified |
| Venues covered | Yes 56 | Not verified |
Where CoinGlass is strong
Broad derivatives analytics: open interest, liquidations and long/short data across major CEXs.
Frequently asked questions
- Does CoinGlass show funding that was actually paid?
- We did not find it on their public pages in our 2026-09-27 check. ORBIT shows the average payouts over 7, 30 and 90 days next to the instantaneous rate.
- How is ORBIT different from CoinGlass for funding arbitrage?
- ORBIT ranks setups by what they actually paid and what is left after order-book entry and exit costs, not by the instantaneous APR, and shows how much money a setup can absorb.
- When was this comparison checked?
- 2026-09-27, from CoinGlass's public pages. Features we could not find are marked "not verified", not "no".