grvtvs
Hyperliquid
Funding rates, fees, liquidity and airdrop status compared for perpetual-futures traders.
Funding setups between these venues
Across 14 liquid markets shared by grvt and Hyperliquid, the best funding setup over the past 7 days is $JUP (long Hyperliquid, short grvt): it paid 15.5% APR, 5.6% after costs, and held 54% of the time.
14 common liquid markets. Ranked by what the setup actually paid over 7 days after entry and exit costs β not by the instantaneous APR.
| Coin | Long | Short | 7d avg | After costs | Holds | Pays back | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $JUP | Hyperliquid | grvt | 15.5% now 4.5% | 5.6% | 54% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $XRP | Hyperliquid | grvt | 5.1% now 4.8% | -4.8% | 42% | 14 d | Backtest β |
| $BNB | grvt | Hyperliquid | 4.4% now -3.9% | -5.5% | 36% | 16 d | Backtest β |
| $1000PEPE | grvt | Hyperliquid | 4.2% now -34.0% | -5.7% | 17% | 17 d | Backtest β |
| $POL | grvt | Hyperliquid | 3.7% now -27.6% | -6.2% | 58% | 19 d | Backtest β |
| $ATOM | Hyperliquid | grvt | 3.4% now -15.7% | -6.5% | 33% | 20 d | Backtest β |
| $BTC | Hyperliquid | grvt | 2.5% now 0.0% | -7.4% | 21% | 28 d | Backtest β |
| $SOL | Hyperliquid | grvt | 1.4% now -19.6% | -8.5% | 30% | 49 d | Backtest β |
| $ZEC | Hyperliquid | grvt | 1.4% now -4.9% | -8.5% | 15% | 50 d | Backtest β |
| $HYPE | Hyperliquid | grvt | 1.0% now 14.4% | -8.9% | 18% | 68 d | Backtest β |
| $PUMP | Hyperliquid | grvt | 0.8% now -14.0% | -9.2% | 21% | 91 d | Backtest β |
| $ETH | grvt | Hyperliquid | 0.2% now -8.4% | -9.7% | 27% | 385 d | Backtest β |
| $NEAR | grvt | Hyperliquid | 0.1% now -8.1% | -9.8% | 1% | 578 d | Backtest β |
| $PAXG | Hyperliquid | grvt | 0.1% now -3.7% | -9.9% | 1% | 1387 d | Backtest β |
β7d avgβ is the funding spread the pair actually paid over the last 7 days. βAfter costsβ subtracts taker fees for opening and closing both legs over a 7-day hold. βHoldsβ is the share of hours the spread kept the same sign and at least 5% APR.
| grvt | Hyperliquid | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | DEX | DEX |
| Taker fee | 0.05% | 0.045%β |
| Maker fee | 0.01%β | 0.015% |
| Open Interest | $330.5M | $6.68Bβ |
| 24h Volume | $567.8M | $11.00Bβ |
| Avg Funding APR | 1.29% | -1.03% |
| Markets | 189β | 177 |
| Airdrop / token | Listed | Listed |
grvt and Hyperliquid are both perpetual-futures venues tracked on ORBIT. On fees, Hyperliquid is cheaper (0.045% vs 0.05% taker). On liquidity, Hyperliquid is deeper with $6.68B open interest, which means less slippage at size.
For a funding-arbitrage trader the practical answer is rarely βone or the otherβ β you often use both, going long on whichever venue has the lower funding for a given asset and short on the other. Open the Funding Screener to see where grvt and Hyperliquid diverge right now, then verify the pair in the backtester.
How this pair behaves
Of 14 setups between grvt and Hyperliquid with 7 days of payouts, 1 stay positive after entry and exit costs. In a typical setup the spread keeps its sign and at least 5% APR 24% of the hours. Opening and closing both legs costs a median 0.19% of the position, paid back in about 38 days. The instantaneous rate is often higher than the weekly one: pick by the "7d avg" and "After costs" columns, not by the current APR.
Related venue pairs
Frequently asked questions
- Which funding setup between grvt and Hyperliquid pays most?
- Across 14 liquid markets shared by grvt and Hyperliquid, the best funding setup over the past 7 days is $JUP (long Hyperliquid, short grvt): it paid 15.5% APR, 5.6% after costs, and held 54% of the time. Ranking is by the 7-day payout after costs, not by the instantaneous APR.
- Is grvt or Hyperliquid cheaper?
- grvt charges 0.05% taker / 0.01% maker; Hyperliquid charges 0.045% taker / 0.015% maker. Hyperliquid has the lower taker fee, which matters most for funding arbitrage since entries and exits are taker orders.
- Which has deeper liquidity, grvt or Hyperliquid?
- grvt has $330.5M open interest across 189 markets; Hyperliquid has $6.68B across 177. Hyperliquid is deeper, which means lower slippage at size.
- Can I run funding arbitrage between grvt and Hyperliquid?
- Yes β when an asset's funding diverges between the two, go long on the lower-funding venue and short on the higher one. Find live divergences on the ORBIT screener and backtest the exact pair before sizing it.