grvtvs
Hyperliquid
Funding rates, fees, liquidity and airdrop status compared for perpetual-futures traders.
Funding setups between these venues
Across 28 liquid markets shared by grvt and Hyperliquid, the best funding setup over the past 7 days is $CFX (long grvt, short Hyperliquid): it paid 22.6% APR, 12.7% after costs, and held 67% of the time.
28 common liquid markets. Ranked by what the setup actually paid over 7 days after entry and exit costs — not by the instantaneous APR.
“7d avg” is the funding spread the pair actually paid over the last 7 days. “After costs” subtracts taker fees for opening and closing both legs over a 7-day hold. “Holds” is the share of hours the spread kept the same sign and at least 5% APR.
| grvt | Hyperliquid | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | DEX | DEX |
| Taker fee | 0.05% | 0.045%✓ |
| Maker fee | 0.01%✓ | 0.015% |
| Open Interest | $471.3M | $6.31B✓ |
| 24h Volume | $472.9M | $7.21B✓ |
| Avg Funding APR | 9.66% | 10.76% |
| Markets | 189✓ | 175 |
| Airdrop / token | Listed | Listed |
grvt and Hyperliquid are both perpetual-futures venues tracked on ORBIT. On fees, Hyperliquid is cheaper (0.045% vs 0.05% taker). On liquidity, Hyperliquid is deeper with $6.31B open interest, which means less slippage at size.
For a funding-arbitrage trader the practical answer is rarely “one or the other” — you often use both, going long on whichever venue has the lower funding for a given asset and short on the other. Open the Funding Screener to see where grvt and Hyperliquid diverge right now, then verify the pair in the backtester.
Frequently asked questions
- Which funding setup between grvt and Hyperliquid pays most?
- Across 28 liquid markets shared by grvt and Hyperliquid, the best funding setup over the past 7 days is $CFX (long grvt, short Hyperliquid): it paid 22.6% APR, 12.7% after costs, and held 67% of the time. Ranking is by the 7-day payout after costs, not by the instantaneous APR.
- Is grvt or Hyperliquid cheaper?
- grvt charges 0.05% taker / 0.01% maker; Hyperliquid charges 0.045% taker / 0.015% maker. Hyperliquid has the lower taker fee, which matters most for funding arbitrage since entries and exits are taker orders.
- Which has deeper liquidity, grvt or Hyperliquid?
- grvt has $471.3M open interest across 189 markets; Hyperliquid has $6.31B across 175. Hyperliquid is deeper, which means lower slippage at size.
- Can I run funding arbitrage between grvt and Hyperliquid?
- Yes — when an asset's funding diverges between the two, go long on the lower-funding venue and short on the higher one. Find live divergences on the ORBIT screener and backtest the exact pair before sizing it.