BloFinvs
Hyperliquid
Funding rates, fees, liquidity and airdrop status compared for perpetual-futures traders.
Funding setups between these venues
Across 58 liquid markets shared by BloFin and Hyperliquid, the best funding setup over the past 7 days is $ATOM (long Hyperliquid, short BloFin): it paid 34.3% APR, 23.3% after costs, and held 66% of the time.
58 common liquid markets. Ranked by what the setup actually paid over 7 days after entry and exit costs β not by the instantaneous APR.
| Coin | Long | Short | 7d avg | After costs | Holds | Pays back | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ATOM | Hyperliquid | BloFin | 34.3% now -32.9% | 23.3% | 66% | 2 d | Backtest β |
| $XMR | BloFin | Hyperliquid | 32.8% now -41.5% | 21.8% | 46% | 2 d | Backtest β |
| $LIT | Hyperliquid | BloFin | 23.7% now 32.9% | 12.8% | 76% | 3 d | Backtest β |
| $INJ | Hyperliquid | BloFin | 21.3% now -3.9% | 10.3% | 76% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $JUP | Hyperliquid | BloFin | 20.9% now -20.2% | 10.0% | 73% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $HYPE | Hyperliquid | BloFin | 19.2% now 26.0% | 8.2% | 70% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $ASTER | Hyperliquid | BloFin | 18.8% now 32.9% | 7.8% | 67% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $AVAX | Hyperliquid | BloFin | 18.4% now 11.8% | 7.4% | 84% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $AERO | Hyperliquid | BloFin | 18.1% now 42.1% | 7.1% | 61% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $XPL | Hyperliquid | BloFin | 17.6% now 32.9% | 6.6% | 67% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $DOGE | Hyperliquid | BloFin | 17.0% now 14.9% | 6.1% | 83% | 5 d | Backtest β |
| $PUMP | Hyperliquid | BloFin | 16.6% now 22.1% | 5.6% | 85% | 5 d | Backtest β |
| $POL | BloFin | Hyperliquid | 16.1% now 16.9% | 5.1% | 76% | 5 d | Backtest β |
| $ICP | Hyperliquid | BloFin | 14.9% now 32.6% | 4.0% | 76% | 5 d | Backtest β |
| $STRK | Hyperliquid | BloFin | 14.9% now -5.0% | 3.9% | 56% | 5 d | Backtest β |
β7d avgβ is the funding spread the pair actually paid over the last 7 days. βAfter costsβ subtracts taker fees for opening and closing both legs over a 7-day hold. βHoldsβ is the share of hours the spread kept the same sign and at least 5% APR.
| BloFin | Hyperliquid | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | CEX | DEX |
| Taker fee | 0.06% | 0.045%β |
| Maker fee | 0.02% | 0.015%β |
| Open Interest | $1.02B | $8.01Bβ |
| 24h Volume | $983.4M | $8.89Bβ |
| Avg Funding APR | 6.48% | 6.53% |
| Markets | 497β | 177 |
| Airdrop / token | β | Listed |
BloFin and Hyperliquid are both perpetual-futures venues tracked on ORBIT. On fees, Hyperliquid is cheaper (0.045% vs 0.06% taker). On liquidity, Hyperliquid is deeper with $8.01B open interest, which means less slippage at size.
For a funding-arbitrage trader the practical answer is rarely βone or the otherβ β you often use both, going long on whichever venue has the lower funding for a given asset and short on the other. Open the Funding Screener to see where BloFin and Hyperliquid diverge right now, then verify the pair in the backtester.
How this pair behaves
Of 15 setups between BloFin and Hyperliquid with 7 days of payouts, 15 stay positive after entry and exit costs. In a typical setup the spread keeps its sign and at least 5% APR 73% of the hours. Opening and closing both legs costs a median 0.21% of the position, paid back in about 4 days. The instantaneous rate is often higher than the weekly one: pick by the "7d avg" and "After costs" columns, not by the current APR.
Related venue pairs
Frequently asked questions
- Which funding setup between BloFin and Hyperliquid pays most?
- Across 58 liquid markets shared by BloFin and Hyperliquid, the best funding setup over the past 7 days is $ATOM (long Hyperliquid, short BloFin): it paid 34.3% APR, 23.3% after costs, and held 66% of the time. Ranking is by the 7-day payout after costs, not by the instantaneous APR.
- Is BloFin or Hyperliquid cheaper?
- BloFin charges 0.06% taker / 0.02% maker; Hyperliquid charges 0.045% taker / 0.015% maker. Hyperliquid has the lower taker fee, which matters most for funding arbitrage since entries and exits are taker orders.
- Which has deeper liquidity, BloFin or Hyperliquid?
- BloFin has $1.02B open interest across 497 markets; Hyperliquid has $8.01B across 177. Hyperliquid is deeper, which means lower slippage at size.
- Can I run funding arbitrage between BloFin and Hyperliquid?
- Yes β when an asset's funding diverges between the two, go long on the lower-funding venue and short on the higher one. Find live divergences on the ORBIT screener and backtest the exact pair before sizing it.