BloFinvs
MEXC
Funding rates, fees, liquidity and airdrop status compared for perpetual-futures traders.
Funding setups between these venues
Across 96 liquid markets shared by BloFin and MEXC, the best funding setup over the past 7 days is $AERO (long MEXC, short BloFin): it paid 44.2% APR, 35.9% after costs, and held 86% of the time.
96 common liquid markets. Ranked by what the setup actually paid over 7 days after entry and exit costs β not by the instantaneous APR.
| Coin | Long | Short | 7d avg | After costs | Holds | Pays back | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $AERO | MEXC | BloFin | 44.2% now 32.9% | 35.9% | 86% | 1 d | Backtest β |
| $WTI | MEXC | BloFin | 24.8% now 0.0% | 16.4% | 77% | 2 d | Backtest β |
| $PUMP | MEXC | BloFin | 19.0% now 16.4% | 10.7% | 85% | 3 d | Backtest β |
| $ASTER | MEXC | BloFin | 18.2% now 32.9% | 9.9% | 67% | 3 d | Backtest β |
| $ICP | MEXC | BloFin | 18.0% now 32.9% | 9.7% | 80% | 3 d | Backtest β |
| $HYPE | MEXC | BloFin | 18.0% now 11.3% | 9.6% | 70% | 3 d | Backtest β |
| $ZRO | MEXC | BloFin | 17.3% now 32.9% | 8.9% | 77% | 3 d | Backtest β |
| $XPL | MEXC | BloFin | 15.8% now 29.0% | 7.5% | 67% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $STRK | MEXC | BloFin | 15.5% now 0.1% | 7.1% | 56% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $GRAM | BloFin | MEXC | 15.2% now -13.9% | 6.9% | 41% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $LIT | MEXC | BloFin | 14.9% now 32.9% | 6.5% | 77% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $ORCL | MEXC | BloFin | 14.3% now 0.0% | 6.0% | 50% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $PENGU | MEXC | BloFin | 13.9% now 5.4% | 5.5% | 62% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $JUP | MEXC | BloFin | 13.1% now 0.9% | 4.8% | 64% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $MU | MEXC | BloFin | 12.2% now 15.9% | 3.9% | 61% | 5 d | Backtest β |
β7d avgβ is the funding spread the pair actually paid over the last 7 days. βAfter costsβ subtracts taker fees for opening and closing both legs over a 7-day hold. βHoldsβ is the share of hours the spread kept the same sign and at least 5% APR.
| BloFin | MEXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | CEX | CEX |
| Taker fee | 0.06% | 0.02%β |
| Maker fee | 0.02% | 0%β |
| Open Interest | $1.00B | $12.59Bβ |
| 24h Volume | $980.1M | $14.42Bβ |
| Avg Funding APR | 11.36% | 9.54% |
| Markets | 497 | 733β |
| Airdrop / token | β | Listed |
BloFin and MEXC are both perpetual-futures venues tracked on ORBIT. On fees, MEXC is cheaper (0.02% vs 0.06% taker). On liquidity, MEXC is deeper with $12.59B open interest, which means less slippage at size.
For a funding-arbitrage trader the practical answer is rarely βone or the otherβ β you often use both, going long on whichever venue has the lower funding for a given asset and short on the other. Open the Funding Screener to see where BloFin and MEXC diverge right now, then verify the pair in the backtester.
How this pair behaves
Of 15 setups between BloFin and MEXC with 7 days of payouts, 15 stay positive after entry and exit costs. In a typical setup the spread keeps its sign and at least 5% APR 67% of the hours. Opening and closing both legs costs a median 0.16% of the position, paid back in about 4 days. The instantaneous rate is often higher than the weekly one: pick by the "7d avg" and "After costs" columns, not by the current APR.
Related venue pairs
Frequently asked questions
- Which funding setup between BloFin and MEXC pays most?
- Across 96 liquid markets shared by BloFin and MEXC, the best funding setup over the past 7 days is $AERO (long MEXC, short BloFin): it paid 44.2% APR, 35.9% after costs, and held 86% of the time. Ranking is by the 7-day payout after costs, not by the instantaneous APR.
- Is BloFin or MEXC cheaper?
- BloFin charges 0.06% taker / 0.02% maker; MEXC charges 0.02% taker / 0% maker. MEXC has the lower taker fee, which matters most for funding arbitrage since entries and exits are taker orders.
- Which has deeper liquidity, BloFin or MEXC?
- BloFin has $1.00B open interest across 497 markets; MEXC has $12.59B across 733. MEXC is deeper, which means lower slippage at size.
- Can I run funding arbitrage between BloFin and MEXC?
- Yes β when an asset's funding diverges between the two, go long on the lower-funding venue and short on the higher one. Find live divergences on the ORBIT screener and backtest the exact pair before sizing it.