Backpackvs
Hyperliquid
Funding rates, fees, liquidity and airdrop status compared for perpetual-futures traders.
| Backpack | Hyperliquid | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | CEX | DEX |
| Taker fee | 0.05% | 0.045%✓ |
| Maker fee | 0.02% | 0.015%✓ |
| Open Interest | $102.9M | $9.95B✓ |
| 24h Volume | $83.3M | $4.93B✓ |
| Avg Funding APR | -7.09% | 13.00% |
| Markets | 50 | 50 |
| Airdrop / token | Listed | Listed |
Backpack and Hyperliquid are both perpetual-futures venues tracked on ORBIT. On fees, Hyperliquid is cheaper (0.045% vs 0.05% taker). On liquidity, Hyperliquid is deeper with $9.95B open interest, which means less slippage at size.
For a funding-arbitrage trader the practical answer is rarely “one or the other” — you often use both, going long on whichever venue has the lower funding for a given asset and short on the other. Open the Funding Screener to see where Backpack and Hyperliquid diverge right now, then verify the pair in the backtester.
Frequently asked questions
- Is Backpack or Hyperliquid cheaper?
- Backpack charges 0.05% taker / 0.02% maker; Hyperliquid charges 0.045% taker / 0.015% maker. Hyperliquid has the lower taker fee, which matters most for funding arbitrage since entries and exits are taker orders.
- Which has deeper liquidity, Backpack or Hyperliquid?
- Backpack has $102.9M open interest across 50 markets; Hyperliquid has $9.95B across 50. Hyperliquid is deeper, which means lower slippage at size.
- Can I run funding arbitrage between Backpack and Hyperliquid?
- Yes — when an asset's funding diverges between the two, go long on the lower-funding venue and short on the higher one. Find live divergences on the ORBIT screener and backtest the exact pair before sizing it.