Bitgetvs
Hotcoin
Funding rates, fees, liquidity and airdrop status compared for perpetual-futures traders.
Funding setups between these venues
Across 163 liquid markets shared by Bitget and Hotcoin, the best funding setup over the past 7 days is $ARIA (long Hotcoin, short Bitget): it paid 167.6% APR, 155.1% after costs, and held 92% of the time.
163 common liquid markets. Ranked by what the setup actually paid over 7 days after entry and exit costs β not by the instantaneous APR.
| Coin | Long | Short | 7d avg | After costs | Holds | Pays back | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ARIA | 167.6% now 47.5% | 155.1% | 92% | <1 d | Backtest β | ||
| $BRENT | 128.1% now -0.0% | 115.6% | 46% | <1 d | Backtest β | ||
| $JCT | 103.7% now -53.4% | 91.2% | 38% | <1 d | Backtest β | ||
| $AERO | 79.9% now 0.0% | 67.4% | 54% | 1 d | Backtest β | ||
| $SOON | 51.0% now 0.0% | 38.5% | 91% | 2 d | Backtest β | ||
| $WTI | 39.8% now -5.5% | 27.3% | 29% | 2 d | Backtest β | ||
| $CAP | 36.2% now 51.1% | 23.7% | 72% | 2 d | Backtest β | ||
| $SIREN | 32.0% now 0.0% | 19.5% | 60% | 3 d | Backtest β | ||
| $EVAA | 25.3% now 30.2% | 12.8% | 76% | 3 d | Backtest β | ||
| $B2 | 25.0% now 4.7% | 12.5% | 58% | 4 d | Backtest β | ||
| $TRUMP | 20.1% now 34.5% | 7.6% | 67% | 4 d | Backtest β | ||
| $WLD | 19.5% now 79.5% | 7.0% | 83% | 4 d | Backtest β | ||
| $CHIP | 19.3% now -21.9% | 6.8% | 59% | 5 d | Backtest β | ||
| $XPD | 17.9% now 21.9% | 5.3% | 88% | 5 d | Backtest β | ||
| $TRX | 16.8% now 2.0% | 4.2% | 76% | 5 d | Backtest β |
β7d avgβ is the funding spread the pair actually paid over the last 7 days. βAfter costsβ subtracts taker fees for opening and closing both legs over a 7-day hold. βHoldsβ is the share of hours the spread kept the same sign and at least 5% APR.
| Bitget | Hotcoin | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | CEX | CEX |
| Taker fee | 0.06% | 0.06% |
| Maker fee | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| Open Interest | $6.89Bβ | $1.93B |
| 24h Volume | $8.39Bβ | $7.12B |
| Avg Funding APR | 0.31% | 9.27% |
| Markets | 718β | 598 |
| Airdrop / token | Listed | Listed |
Bitget and Hotcoin are both perpetual-futures venues tracked on ORBIT. On fees, both charge the same 0.06% taker. On liquidity, Bitget is deeper with $6.89B open interest, which means less slippage at size.
For a funding-arbitrage trader the practical answer is rarely βone or the otherβ β you often use both, going long on whichever venue has the lower funding for a given asset and short on the other. Open the Funding Screener to see where Bitget and Hotcoin diverge right now, then verify the pair in the backtester.
How this pair behaves
Of 15 setups between Bitget and Hotcoin with 7 days of payouts, 15 stay positive after entry and exit costs. In a typical setup the spread keeps its sign and at least 5% APR 67% of the hours. Opening and closing both legs costs a median 0.24% of the position, paid back in about 3 days. The instantaneous rate is often higher than the weekly one: pick by the "7d avg" and "After costs" columns, not by the current APR.
Related venue pairs
Frequently asked questions
- Which funding setup between Bitget and Hotcoin pays most?
- Across 163 liquid markets shared by Bitget and Hotcoin, the best funding setup over the past 7 days is $ARIA (long Hotcoin, short Bitget): it paid 167.6% APR, 155.1% after costs, and held 92% of the time. Ranking is by the 7-day payout after costs, not by the instantaneous APR.
- Is Bitget or Hotcoin cheaper?
- Bitget charges 0.06% taker / 0.02% maker; Hotcoin charges 0.06% taker / 0.02% maker. Both are equal on taker fee, which matters most for funding arbitrage since entries and exits are taker orders.
- Which has deeper liquidity, Bitget or Hotcoin?
- Bitget has $6.89B open interest across 718 markets; Hotcoin has $1.93B across 598. Bitget is deeper, which means lower slippage at size.
- Can I run funding arbitrage between Bitget and Hotcoin?
- Yes β when an asset's funding diverges between the two, go long on the lower-funding venue and short on the higher one. Find live divergences on the ORBIT screener and backtest the exact pair before sizing it.