OKXvs
Toobit
Funding rates, fees, liquidity and airdrop status compared for perpetual-futures traders.
Funding setups between these venues
Across 139 liquid markets shared by OKX and Toobit, the best funding setup over the past 7 days is $ONE (long Toobit, short OKX): it paid 59.6% APR, 48.2% after costs, and held 73% of the time.
139 common liquid markets. Ranked by what the setup actually paid over 7 days after entry and exit costs β not by the instantaneous APR.
| Coin | Long | Short | 7d avg | After costs | Holds | Pays back | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ONE | Toobit | OKX | 59.6% now 72.7% | 48.2% | 73% | 1 d | Backtest β |
| $BRENT | OKX | Toobit | 59.5% now 43.8% | 48.1% | 95% | 1 d | Backtest β |
| $PIEVERSE | OKX | Toobit | 47.9% now -4.3% | 36.4% | 92% | 2 d | Backtest β |
| $LIT | OKX | Toobit | 23.5% now 43.8% | 12.0% | 65% | 3 d | Backtest β |
| $COIN | OKX | Toobit | 23.3% now 25.1% | 11.8% | 96% | 3 d | Backtest β |
| $SKHY | Toobit | OKX | 21.9% now 21.9% | 10.5% | 100% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $AERO | Toobit | OKX | 21.0% now 0.0% | 9.6% | 42% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $WTI | OKX | Toobit | 19.9% now 0.0% | 8.4% | 67% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $TSLA | Toobit | OKX | 18.6% now 21.9% | 7.1% | 80% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $ARX | OKX | Toobit | 18.1% now 56.5% | 6.7% | 61% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $H | OKX | Toobit | 17.9% now 18.5% | 6.4% | 41% | 4 d | Backtest β |
| $XCU | OKX | Toobit | 17.7% now -43.8% | 6.3% | 38% | 5 d | Backtest β |
| $JUP | OKX | Toobit | 14.4% now 12.2% | 2.9% | 64% | 6 d | Backtest β |
| $STRC | Toobit | OKX | 14.2% now 21.9% | 2.7% | 72% | 6 d | Backtest β |
| $DOT | OKX | Toobit | 13.5% now 31.8% | 2.0% | 85% | 6 d | Backtest β |
β7d avgβ is the funding spread the pair actually paid over the last 7 days. βAfter costsβ subtracts taker fees for opening and closing both legs over a 7-day hold. βHoldsβ is the share of hours the spread kept the same sign and at least 5% APR.
| OKX | Toobit | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | CEX | CEX |
| Taker fee | 0.05%β | 0.06% |
| Maker fee | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| Open Interest | $7.25Bβ | $5.63B |
| 24h Volume | $27.68Bβ | $15.95B |
| Avg Funding APR | -0.46% | -0.88% |
| Markets | 502 | 733β |
| Airdrop / token | Listed | Listed |
OKX and Toobit are both perpetual-futures venues tracked on ORBIT. On fees, OKX is cheaper (0.05% vs 0.06% taker). On liquidity, OKX is deeper with $7.25B open interest, which means less slippage at size.
For a funding-arbitrage trader the practical answer is rarely βone or the otherβ β you often use both, going long on whichever venue has the lower funding for a given asset and short on the other. Open the Funding Screener to see where OKX and Toobit diverge right now, then verify the pair in the backtester.
How this pair behaves
Of 15 setups between OKX and Toobit with 7 days of payouts, 15 stay positive after entry and exit costs. In a typical setup the spread keeps its sign and at least 5% APR 72% of the hours. Opening and closing both legs costs a median 0.22% of the position, paid back in about 4 days. The instantaneous rate is often higher than the weekly one: pick by the "7d avg" and "After costs" columns, not by the current APR.
Related venue pairs
Frequently asked questions
- Which funding setup between OKX and Toobit pays most?
- Across 139 liquid markets shared by OKX and Toobit, the best funding setup over the past 7 days is $ONE (long Toobit, short OKX): it paid 59.6% APR, 48.2% after costs, and held 73% of the time. Ranking is by the 7-day payout after costs, not by the instantaneous APR.
- Is OKX or Toobit cheaper?
- OKX charges 0.05% taker / 0.02% maker; Toobit charges 0.06% taker / 0.02% maker. OKX has the lower taker fee, which matters most for funding arbitrage since entries and exits are taker orders.
- Which has deeper liquidity, OKX or Toobit?
- OKX has $7.25B open interest across 502 markets; Toobit has $5.63B across 733. OKX is deeper, which means lower slippage at size.
- Can I run funding arbitrage between OKX and Toobit?
- Yes β when an asset's funding diverges between the two, go long on the lower-funding venue and short on the higher one. Find live divergences on the ORBIT screener and backtest the exact pair before sizing it.