ORBIT
Strategy· 5 min read

Price Arbitrage vs Funding Arbitrage: What's the Difference?

Both trades are delta-neutral and use two venues, but they capture different inefficiencies. When to use which, and why mixing them up loses money.

Funding arbitrage and price arbitrage are often confused because the trade structure looks identical — open opposing positions on two venues. The economic logic, hold period, and risk profile are completely different.

Funding Arbitrage

Captures the funding-rate gap between two venues. The mark price on both venues is usually the same; only the funding rate differs. You hold the position indefinitely, collecting the rate spread every settlement window. Exit when the spread compresses or fees eat it up.

Price Arbitrage (Convergence Trade)

Captures a temporary mark-price difference between two venues quoting the same asset. The funding rates may be identical; what differs is the spot/mark itself. You long the cheap venue, short the rich one, and exit when the prices converge — usually within hours, not days.

Why You Can't Mix Them

A common rookie mistake: see a 19% "spread" on /arbitrage, open the trade hoping to collect 19% APR. But that 19% isn't an annualized rate — it's a point-in-time mark-price gap. If the prices converge in 30 minutes, you make 19% in 30 minutes. If they don't converge, you make zero (or lose if the gap widens).

Our /screener is for funding arbitrage. Our /arbitrage page is for price arbitrage. The math is different, the screening criteria are different, the hold period is different. Don't cross the streams.

When to Use Which

Use funding arbitrage when…

Use price arbitrage when…

The trades are complementary. A serious operator runs both books in parallel: funding-arb for baseline yield, price-arb for occasional bursts of higher return when venues quote out of sync.

#price-arb#funding-arb#convergence

Try the strategy live — 30+ venues, real execution cost from live order books.

Open Funding Screener →
Start Trading →